| # | User | Message | Date |
| 25 | Graham | View | 17-Mar-08 4:18 |
| 24 | Paul | is it view related or core related? | 17-Mar-08 1:57 |
| 23 | Henrik | I think it was mentioned way back to REBOL/View 1.2. Long time ago. | 17-Mar-08 0:43 |
| 22 | Paul | thanks Henrik. Did this leak exist in the previous version of 2.7.5? | 17-Mar-08 0:25 |
| 21 | Henrik | Gabriele, correction: You can show or hide C leaks. Obj-C leaks are always shown. | 16-Mar-08 23:01 |
| 20 | Henrik | http://www.apple.com/macosx/developertools/instruments.html | 16-Mar-08 22:53 |
| 19 | Paul | what is instruments? | 16-Mar-08 22:51 |
| 18 | Henrik | I just don't get why I can't repeat results reliably yet. I may be doing something wrong. | 16-Mar-08 22:49 |
| 17 | Henrik | I don't know if you tried it, but you can specifically turn off Objective-C level leak detection in instruments. That's what I did for my tests. | 16-Mar-08 22:48 |
| 16 | Gabriele | might account for leaks in view, but i think rebol's just using bsd sockets for networking. | 16-Mar-08 22:47 |
| 15 | Gabriele | so I guess they are leaks at the objective c level? | 16-Mar-08 22:46 |
| 14 | Henrik | Gabriele, all I know right now is that it's the successor to an older program called ObjectAlloc. | 16-Mar-08 22:05 |
| 13 | Gabriele | do we know how instruments tracks leaks? | 16-Mar-08 21:25 |
| 12 | Henrik | now I can't get it to leak with that code... I wonder if there is a bug in Instruments.... | 16-Mar-08 21:01 |
| 11 | Henrik | ok | 16-Mar-08 20:56 |
| 10 | Graham | Not using stats | 16-Mar-08 20:51 |
| 9 | Graham | I'm using the windows task manager. | 16-Mar-08 20:51 |
| 8 | Henrik | are you looking at stats? I get those numbers myself, but during that time there is no leak indication. | 16-Mar-08 20:17 |
| 7 | Graham | stopped again at 10,508 k | 16-Mar-08 20:09 |
| 6 | Graham | hmm .. started up again by itself.! | 16-Mar-08 20:06 |
| 5 | Graham | looks as though you are probably right .. two different leaks | 16-Mar-08 20:05 |
| 4 | Graham | Mine has stopped at 8520 k | 16-Mar-08 20:04 |
| 3 | Henrik | perhaps they are two different leaks | 16-Mar-08 20:00 |
| 2 | Graham | wonder why this leak is larger ? | 16-Mar-08 19:59 |
| 1 | Henrik | view/new make face []
a: open/binary/direct/no-wait tcp://:9000
forever [wait reduce [ a 0.001]] This produces a 16 byte leak when started. And when I move the window and click in it, I get a lot of 64 byte leaks. | 16-Mar-08 19:54 |