| # | User | Message | Date |
| 44 | Brock | http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=read-below.r | 9-Oct 17:47 |
| 43 | Brock | Ah, I was mistaken. I used the read-below.r script from Brett Handley... | 9-Oct 17:47 |
| 42 | Gregg | http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=file-list.r | 9-Oct 16:20 |
| 41 | Brock | There is one in the library if I recall as I got one from somewhere. It's not on this machine, but I'll post the name of it when I get to work. I believe it was built by Gregg. | 9-Oct 11:43 |
| 40 | Maarten | Teasing... imagine using scan dir with S3... | 9-Oct 10:50 |
| 39 | Terry | I think combining this with some javascript visulizations would be cool.. Search for files by timeline http://simile.mit.edu/timeline/ Relate files using Arc / Node http://kylescholz.com/projects/wordnet/ | 9-Oct 6:51 |
| 38 | Henrik | Interesting. I could not find that in my list of scripts on rebol.org. It's the same function, so just use the one on rebol.org. | 9-Oct 6:32 |
| 37 | Terry | this looks good too http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=scan-dir.r | 9-Oct 6:31 |
| 36 | Henrik | Terry, perhaps this is useful: http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/file-utilities.r Look at SCAN-DIR. | 9-Oct 6:29 |
| 35 | Terry | Is there a recursive directory crawler script somewhere? | 9-Oct 6:24 |
| 34 | Graham | the ones who want a web interface would not have started with Synapse. | 8-Oct 11:09 |
| 33 | Pekr | I wonder - how are they satisfied with the gui. Aren't they pushing for web interface? | 8-Oct 11:08 |
| 32 | Graham | secret :) | 8-Oct 11:08 |
| 31 | Pekr | Graham - if it is not business secret - how many customers do you have approximately? | 8-Oct 11:08 |
| 30 | Graham | still some rebgui bugs on resizing :( | 8-Oct 11:06 |
| 29 | DideC | I have played a bit with the MS medical stuff recently. I'm amazed that you have "replicated" the UI in Synapse. Very nice work. | 8-Oct 11:04 |
| 28 | Henrik | That's cool, although it's a shame the article is a bit flawed. | 8-Oct 8:12 |
| 27 | Graham | I've been told that people have been heading over to rebol.com from there :) | 8-Oct 7:28 |
| 26 | Henrik | Graham, congrats for the exposure. :-) | 8-Oct 6:47 |
| 25 | Graham | Thanks. | 8-Oct 6:44 |
| 24 | Anton | Yep, Synapse is a good work. | 8-Oct 6:43 |
| 23 | Graham | Barbara Duck who writes the blog used to be a MS developer :) | 8-Oct 0:29 |
| 22 | BrianH | Still, cool interface - looks really useful :) | 8-Oct 0:28 |
| 21 | BrianH | Cool for you, though all the MS references were unnerving. | 8-Oct 0:28 |
| 20 | Graham | Rebol in the news ... http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com/2008/10/common-user-interface-ehr-development.html | 8-Oct 0:17 |
| 19 | Graham | Has anyone written a ftp client like "ftp" on linux? | 6-Oct 23:15 |
| 18 | Maarten | *feeling | 6-Oct 17:38 |
| 17 | Maarten | I don't know who did it, but I have a felling that it's been done already. | 6-Oct 17:38 |
| 16 | Terry | Should be straight-forward.. .use a block of key/value pairs.. each key is unique.
But it should have a size limit, and when the limit is reached, the least used pair should be replaced with the new pair. Any string could be converted to binary and use that as the key? In PHP you would do an MD5 on the string to build the key. | 6-Oct 9:44 |
| 15 | Terry | I'm looking to build a Rebol version of Memcached.. any suggestions? | 6-Oct 9:37 |
| 14 | Henrik | I miss a group that collects people's wow experiences with REBOL. I know people can tell a lot of good stories on that. :-) | 5-Oct 19:45 |
| 13 | BrianH | That would make this group a good starting point :) | 5-Oct 19:28 |
| 12 | BrianH | Sounds good, especially if it includes chat about being a REBOL programmer and fan - I don't think there is a group specific to that. We might want to set a guideline that if people start to discuss in depth a specific product or feature that doesn't have a group specific to it, we should create a group for that product or feature. | 5-Oct 19:27 |
| 11 | Graham | Sometimes I have something to discuss that is not a covered entity .. and so I use chat .. now I will use REBOL chat. | 5-Oct 19:22 |
| 10 | Graham | Does that sound okay? | 5-Oct 19:21 |
| 9 | Graham | Any REBOL chat not covered by the specific groups. If a new group is created that covers that topic, then subsequent discussion becomes inappropriate. | 5-Oct 19:20 |
| 8 | BrianH | I'm sorry if chat about this group is off topic for the group, but ground rules for the group help to keep discussions appropriate without needing to go private. | 5-Oct 19:19 |
| 7 | BrianH | For instance, that last suggestion would keep questions like RobertS's one about the R3 alpha in the !REBOL3 group (no offense). | 5-Oct 19:17 |
| 6 | BrianH | Or is this a group for chatting about REBOL in general, but not to ask specific questions about any particular feature or product (since they have their own groups)? We don't have one of those - it could be like a civil Advocacy group. | 5-Oct 19:14 |
| 5 | BrianH | There are plenty of groups for REBOL discussions about specific topics, but having a general web-public one is interesting. What are the ground rules? Is it to be a non-version-specific !REBOL3 or a group like Advocacy, except without anti-REBOL advocacy being off topic? | 5-Oct 19:11 |
| 4 | Henrik | There has not been an internal alpha yet, and I don't know when it's going to be available. | 5-Oct 7:18 |
| 3 | RobertS | any hint of an R3 alpha coming available with VID 3.4+ ? | 5-Oct 0:36 |
| 2 | PeterWood | Please keep to Rebol related topics. | 4-Oct 4:32 |
| 1 | PeterWood | I've created this channel for Rebol related discussions. | 4-Oct 4:28 |