From DocBase

Article vs Talk page

Please bring these arguments up in the section discussing why this should be done - if you haven't already. This section is for "Why Not" (or with your retitle: "Reasons Not"). That's why I separated out the section from the one above it (before you moved it to the other page). BrianH 20:03, 11 December 2009 (EST)

Don't be afraid to reorganize if you think there's a better way--you don't have to ask. I'll be more likely to just follow suit with a good idea or a compromise in organization than to pick a fight! To me, reorganization is the very raison d'etre of a wiki. It's why it can produce content quickly, with everyone doing what they do best. Assume good faith and all that...

My vague idea was that the article would represent consensus matters, with sufficient derivation to be far clearer to any newcomer than reading the talk pages. It's a little tricky when the page is about a "proposal" I guess during the pro/con hammering-out phase. The derivation can end up sounding like it includes all the pros and none of the cons. But I wanted to just keep any statements that would need attribution out of it. If we agree on something being a pro or a con, that's the ideal situation to start from... Fork 02:07, 12 December 2009 (EST)

Barnstar of Diligence

Wanted to take a moment to express my appreciation for the time you are taking in these discussions. I'm also very grateful you are doing so in a medium that is outside the inner sanctum of Rebol-oriented tools. If more in the Rebol community were so willing, then I'm sure that by now there would be a very comprehensive repository of information refined from it.

So I'd like to award you the Barnstar of Diligence.

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Awarded to BrianH for his forward-thinking attitude and dedication to sincere technical engagement on this wiki. Fork 02:07, 12 December 2009 (EST)