REBOL 3.0

Review recent blog comments

Clarifying REBOL Lib Interfaces [0331] 2 CmtsAbuse
Carl Sassenrath
26-Aug-2010 18:05:34
Yes. Works both ways. Thanks for pointing that out.
Brian Hawley
26-Aug-2010 16:47:26
Will the macros be available in embedded extensions as well, if differently declared? This would allow externalized and internalized extensions to use more of the same source code. If less rewriting is required, it will be easier to change your mind whether to internalize or externalize.
In A103: REBOL system error #9910 [0330] 3 CmtsAbuse
shadwolf
24-Aug-2010 21:55:46
andrian i like you posting that shows how fast reaction Carl is in cure code you post you ticket in curecode on 18:30 at 22:30 carl close it with a solved state.
Adrian
24-Aug-2010 12:12:07
Submitted as issue #1642 in CureCode.
Adrian
23-Aug-2010 16:19:31
Not much to do to trigger this - just start up a new console from an a103 executable and invoke "read http://www.rebol.com".
Progress on callbacks [0329] 2 CmtsAbuse
Xavier
19-Aug-2010 7:49:30
Cool, i dont sleep well when i see something i dont understand.
Gregg Irwin
17-Aug-2010 16:10:58
Exciting news indeed. I'm glad to hear there's no magic involved.
Access to the host r3lib from extensions [0328] 3 CmtsAbuse
shadwolf
24-Aug-2010 21:48:10
Onetom yeah and the capable poeple in rebol's community will force you to pay for their help so bro don't got too far of your visa or your mastercard that will become your best tool to get anything here.

I looked more into R3 hostkit ... we are zillion years away from the keep it simple phylosophy that's sad ... what ever the api is with such a mixed thing you can't expect Carl more than 10 people around the world to use it ...

Sorry if i'm rude but i say the things as they appears to me i'm the first in commenting this subject anyway in more than a month proof that most of the people around just don't give a damn about it ...

R3 hostkit would be in my opinion more easy to understand if the inner inherence hierarchy was made more clear ... what caused me problems was to identify how the rebol part is linked to the C part... how rebol use code described in the C files? things like that i'm not good at explaining that but that's my feeling.

onetom
21-Aug-2010 5:39:07
in ruby1.9 some basic syntax constructs has been deprecated changes after ruby1.8.7. they included the complex number class into the core libraries, so our application clashed with it, since we had a complex class too, but in the sense of big building groups.

the community's answer to this was: http://isitruby19.com/

it tracked how ruby libraries are catching up with these changes.

for me it took ~2hrs to make a ~200 file rails app compatible with it.

i wouldn't worry much about such api changes. there are a lot of capable ppl in the software communities.

Shadwolf
14-Aug-2010 12:54:07
Hum over a week without answer to this question ?

Well i don't know the details but i think as you did carl an the r3lib should have some "access" features and allowing to keep a certain degree of interfacing while at same time allowing the bellow API to evolve.

After that as i said i don't know the details the R3 is still in R3 so if you do have to make an evolving API that's noW ...

Full Speed Ahead? [0327] 7 CmtsAbuse
shadwolf
24-Aug-2010 21:28
"Without an official testing approach/policy, there will be no consistent test suite over time... just a bunch of hacked together test fragments."

i'm agree and that's what i try to speak with the community those past days/weeks. actually the R3 GUI effort is based on an effort based upon some money raised without knowing clearly what is the task due for that money. And for the future what will be the outcomes of having outside people taking in ostage the project because they claim loans for the project to evolve.

Having the need to ressort to the king dollar as ultimate mean of presure to put at work our lazy comunity is not a good sign sent to the world... and it's not a setup for futur, for a proper design.

when i try to get informations or a serious discution about those aspect all I get are insults. the Gurus are being arrogant and overtaking the project...(by the way i didn't knew robert Münch could lead anything regarding rebol's VID... so if the architect don't know how to build a house how will he ensure us that it's crew won't build the house upside down)

Those gurus are liying to us by saying this way is the only affortable way to make R3 GUI project go on.

I like the fact VID is externalised in hostkit but instead of being the base of a new mature motion in our dieing community on educational level and being inspired to build the new vid in commun based on those 10 past years of experience thank to those undelicate avid of financial profit autoproclaimed Gurus it will be the swarn song for rebol.

Pairs as Floating Point? [0326] 9 CmtsAbuse
Xavier
19-Aug-2010 7:47:07
The fact is that the notion of pair can represent different things : a pixel is by its nature different than a geographic data. The choice of rounding it or not depends of its use. It might be interesting to have a pair! and a floatingpair! with strict rules to deal with rounding when casting one to another one. If the objective is to avoid to have another datatype, it will be necessary to fix the problem of pixel with an arbitrary decision...
Update on Graphics in Host-Kit [0324] 10 CmtsAbuse
shadwolf
25-Aug-2010 17:45:30
how do we know 255.255.255.255 is a color RGBA and not an ip adress or an ip mask ( ok the draw context ...) ?

REBOL 3.0
Updated 7-Sep-2010 - Edit - Copyright REBOL Technologies - REBOL.net